Software testing wai

I assume that because as I understand implicitWait is one time setup. Is it really recommended to use implicit rather than explicit?

Implicit will make your testing time longer It will apply to whole script. So it is recommended to use. We use explicit wait in special conditions only like some element is taking too much time to be visible, waiting for alert or some text etc.. Hope this will clear your doubt. HI i have some doubt for example we given 15 seconds in implicit wait, the element is clickable with in the 10 seconds. It is wait until 15 seconds even though the element is click able before 15 seconds or it it will continue to next.

Same as Explicit can u give the answer please i faced this question in one of the interview. HI ,implicit wait will wait upto 15 seconds,when selenium finds element at 10 seconds , it will continue the process. Eplicit wait : will wait for 15 seconds no matter if element present or not if the element present also in 10th seconds it should wait for 15 seconds. And if you have applied explicit wait also then explicit wait will also try to find the element even though implicit wait already have found but , you have written the line of code for explicit wait and the line of code will execute and explicit wait will try to find and lets say explicit wait found the element in 2 seconds then code will execute Attending software testing conferences offers you an opportunity to improve your software testing skills and techniques and allows you to hear about real-life use cases and solutions that you can apply in your organization.

You'll also get to learn about the latest tools and technologies in the industry, as well as meet and exchange ideas with industry leaders. If you want to delve further into the world of software testing and gain some major insights into the state of the industry, the best way to do that is to attend a testing conference. Here is TechBeacon 's shortlist of the most popular QA and testing conferences in Twitter: testguilds , automationguild Web: guildconferences.

Automation Guild is an annual online event dedicated to helping attendees achieve reliable automation and succeed with their automation testing efforts. At the event, attendees will discover the most actionable tips, tools, techniques, and strategies from the world's top automation experts.

Twitter: microfocus , MicroFocusUniverse Web: microfocus. This conference, which attracts customers and partners of Micro Focus products and services, will run this year as a virtual event, with regional agendas for Europe, the Americas, and Asia-Pacific. Attendees will hear from Micro Focus experts, partners, and customers, who will discuss use cases and best practices around software development, testing, and a range of other areas. Twitter: icstconference Web: icst This conference provides a common forum for practitioners and others around the world to present their latest research findings, ideas, developments, and applications in the areas of software testing, verification, and validation.

ICST will include keynote addresses by eminent scientists, as well as special, regular, and poster sessions. Who should attend: Researchers, scientists, engineers, and software industry practitioners.

Twitter: saucelabs Web: saucecon. SauceCon is Sauce Labs' annual event for the testing software vendor's global community. It also attracts many pros who don't use Sauce Labs products but are otherwise involved with automated testing. The multi-track virtual conference brings together the global testing community to learn from each other and explore best practices for ensuring digital confidence. Who should attend: Test automation professionals, users of Sauce Labs products, and anyone doing testing with a cloud service.

StarEast will feature over 75 talks, including keynotes, tutorials, and sessions, all presented in an interactive format. Twitter: AgileTD Web: openair. Parallel to that will be workshops and other interactive sessions and activities for hands-on learning.

Twitter: nordictestdays Web: nordictestingdays. This regional conference attracts testers largely from the Baltics and other Northern European countries, and the event has something to offer both seasoned and new-to-testing professionals. The forum's organizers say it's a good conference for "anyone who is interested in dipping their toes into testing and contributing to smoother software development cycle and quality. Who should attend: Originally for testing professionals only, the conference now attracts everyone from programmers and UX specialists to project managers and designers.

This conference is aimed at all software engineers and testing professionals. According to the conference organizers, the forum offers "a fun platform" to connect and network with the agile community through tutorials, workshops, keynotes, talks, and social events. In terms of data appearing to change, a malicious font provider could supply fonts which are mapped incorrectly. Imagine if they supplied icons in a font, and you're using either a tick or a cross to indicate, for example, whether a blood sample was found to have a specific disease.

By mapping the "tick" symbol to the "cross" value, and vice versa, an end user might think they've got some disease due to seeing this in the output. This would be a very targeted attack, so would probably only apply in very specific cases. This is unlikely to happen with Google Fonts, but could apply if you allowed linking to arbitrary web fonts.

Note that it would be possible for any stylesheet to perform similar attacks - for sensitive data, it's generally worth keeping anything that can modify the behaviour or appearance of the application hosted locally, unless you have specific requirements making this impossible.

For sensitive data, I'd advise hosting the fonts and any other stylesheets and scripts yourself, if possible, just for peace of mind. C Option 4 When the user clicks proceed to checkout, the user has filled their basket, they've spent time on it and are more than likely committed to buying the item s in it.

This is what Amazon and alot of ecommerce platforms do. Now I know that users are different etc but theres no reason to reinvent the wheel. The reason I chose 4: 1 may deter them right at the start to continue shopping and may interrupt their flow in looking for items and is a bit abrupt.

You can always test them with your users and see what returns the best conversions. But option 4 is a convention and arguably the best UX. D You should either redirect the request with a response or forward the page in your backend. If you want to use it anyway you have to make sure that you do not expose any data for not authenticated requests. A It's a widespread convention, and based on the assumption that the use lost likely mistyped the word, and want it corrected.

If you make the option opt-in, this use case becomes much more complex for the user, as they have to notice the option however you present it , and explicitly select it. In the case of search engines, if the user notices the unwanted correction pretty likely, as the search results won't match what they wanted , opt-out is easy and straightforward. In the case of iOS and MS Office spelling correction, opt-out is only available shortly after the correction.

This is sometimes a problem for fast typists.